tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17548084.post8864610476122102985..comments2024-03-28T00:26:20.590-07:00Comments on out there: Should it be the law?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17548084.post-43561624779006686862007-02-16T23:24:00.000-07:002007-02-16T23:24:00.000-07:00These are very interesting perspectives but in man...These are very interesting perspectives but in many cases quite ironic. PLBs without question make rescues safer for search and rescue personnel but the SAR organizations quoted seem to either not take a view or stress their concerns that people will take unnecessary risks. The only unnecessary risk is to engage in potentially risky activities without taking advantage of technology that can save your life. Even if those engaging in risky activities don't want to carry a PLB they should consider their family's peace of mind and the safety of those risking their lives to rescue them. There are many documented cases of people rescued who would never go back into the wilderness again without a PLB but no evidence that people are taking additional risk because they have a PLB. All that being said, the best solution that addresses the various concerns and viewpoints equally in my opinion is currently being considered by several states: If you engage in outdoor activities and SAR has to go looking for you, you pay for the cost of the rescue....unless you are carrying a PLB.<BR/>Kevin Stoltz<BR/>www.PLBRentals.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com